Excerpts from that story:"An eviction complaint filed on Aug. 15 by a landlord in Pima County Consolidated Justice Court indicated that Stansell had previously threatened violence.

The "social justice" emphasis there plays a major role in how the attorneys and courts view a dispute.

**************************************************************Senators, Regulator Call for More Scrutiny of “We Buy Ugly Houses” CompanyThe Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s head said the Department of Justice and state attorneys general should be made aware of predatory house-flipping practices, following ProPublica reporting on HomeVestors of America.https://www.propublica.org/article/senators-call-for-scrutin... 

I'm curious if there are any companies or groups challenging the presiding assumption that building individual wealth through real estate inherently reinforces and exacerbates housing equity/justice issues... maybe there are strategies that allow people to align REI teams and rental approach with social impact objectives?

Hopefully justice will be served soon. 

You're not doing your argument for being lenient on marijuana users any justice by saying landlords should also be lenient when it comes to allowing applicants with convictions for any drug that comes from a plant.I'm just sayin'

I've heard back from the NC Commissioner of Banks that office directed me to contact the NC Department of Justice as the NCCB doesn't have jurisdiction.I haven't done that however, their attorney Ayelet Faerman sent me a threatening email to remove my content from Bigger Pockets or we would face a federal lawsuit.I asked their attorney to have her clients issue a full refund as it is reasonably believable that XPRESS LOANS should not be charging non-refundable upfront fees in connection with any loan.My wife and I both have excellent credit, and my wife should not have been steered into a "hard money loan" by Xpress Loans.My wife went behind my back and conducted the transaction in question with Xpress without consulting with me. 

The cash flow is just icing on the cake to them as they do not need the money.

PS> Some owners of buildings (and their lenders) renting to MM dispensaries in CA (even legal ones) have received letters from US Justice Dept stating that they are operating the building leasing to a drug dealer, and the real property can be seized under RICO or some similar code..

3 BR minimum and more than 1 BA is just icing on the cake.