Some it's not an issue, on others it's interpreted differently.  

." - Kudos Don, once again.If the interpretation of this was cut and dry, there would be no debate now would there?  

Right now I am not sure whether to interprete it as my main overall goal of financial independence or to focus on one step at a time like the next property I would like to purchase.

In this case, property ownership (via title and deed) through the LLC, but a mortgage owed completely and totally by the individual(s).It's a VERY strict interpretation and has it's basis back in the day when LLCs were brand new.  

I asking my sources at Tesla - San Jose, CA to help me interpret the info.

But also subject to interpretation, since the guideline is vague. 

@Joe Conklin I would interpret #1 to mean that the entire remaining principal will be due in one year.

I would interpret that to mean you had both the right of redemption and ownership once someone else redeemed.So as Wayne said you probably have 2/15ths worth of the property.

Then it becomes a matter of interpretation on whether it is part of the original scope of work or a change order and and who should pay for it? 

Hi Yuki,Going with a narrow interpretation of your question, I thought I'd shoot a quick reply about research.