Adding a 500k house to the property would put it into the 2m price class (was my retirement plan) at that point I’d sell it with around a 1.5-1.8 gain on my actual cash invested and the only people who would be able to afford it would be the Wall Street bankers that wouldn’t put their kids in the school and wouldn’t stimulate the local economy.

I didn't see groups of people congregating on porches or street corners, nor did I see any kids hanging around ... because they're in school like they're supposed to be at 11:30 AM on a weekday. 

The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer, and not a single worthwhile word of any authority was ever said in my home and or my school about how someone who is broke might stop being broke, and why that could be a worthwhile life goal.

I also have no debt and I am on a full ride for school. 

The most common criteria I see investors evaluating when considering location are job growth, population growth, and school systems.

Looks like these people would stay with me a few years, and I expect school taxes to go up that much each year.

Good schools are what I value most.

(The rail that supplies the high voltage to power a train on an electric railway.)I'm not even sure where to start – first I am not an attorney, I didn’t attend law school, I “Lived” Law (experience) It’s not theoretical to me. ;-)I’ve only done Creative Finance Deals.

And what about that high school biology?

UC is in very high demand so vacancy is basically 0, it isn't really a "party school" unlike somewhere like UCLA (weird example I know) so you won't have to deal with those issues as much, depending on how many people live there, who you rent it to (frat/party kids, etc).