No problem!

Its a tough subject because logically, they are joint and several guarantys so rationally a 100% guaranty from each of two people (one 740 one 680 for example) is ALWAYS going to be better than just one 100% guaranty from someone at 740 (so it wouldn't make sense to have a better rate for the latter)The problem is that there is fraud and "straw borrowers" out there where someone who is not involved in the property signs on to boost score and terms - so many DSCR Lenders in response either do the "non-rational" thing and price to the lower to avoid the fraud or use the higher of the two (and either be a little loose with things or just stay vigilant on any funny business)

There a many agents that are just investors and they don’t want or need to be in the mls.The problem is how you set it up.

Your background in construction and problem-solving mindset is a perfect fit for real estate.

From my experience, many investors prefer to stay hands-off and avoid the day-to-day operations—managing contractors, solving unexpected issues, or finding a replacement electrician.

Yes, this creates problems for title companies and title insurers to resolve. 

Cash for liquidity is no problem. 

Need input / ideas / comments on following pls.I have 2 SF rentals that I'm facing foreclosure on as I fell behind w/ the mortgage payments on (due to unrelated problems).

The problem is that they've all been fully occupied. 

There's no problem with a seller's agent egregiously pricing things when the FMV states differently, so there's no problem with a buyer being egregiously aggressive too.