data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f8cc/9f8cceee6203e1a41f9927839b99743749cc974c" alt=""
4 February 2025 | 11 replies
It would take you a life time of cash flow in Ohio to get that return.I would strongly advise you against paying cash for a $100k property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cec6c/cec6c9bd768a052f8f6a512145877f0e949bf6e3" alt=""
19 January 2025 | 7 replies
Right now, the best offers around me are for some 1.3-4 million, that only generated around 100k per year gross, so there would be a high chance of not cash flowing, and paying money, especially with a commercial loan (these buildings have more than 4 units).I was thinking that although the rental itself does not generate money, I would be able to deduct the mortgage interest, and depreciation from my personal w2 income and would be net positive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2f94/e2f9418d72fc1a1270937b2c3cbb9de1457f3620" alt=""
24 January 2025 | 36 replies
Am I ok with this plan to ride up the appreciation, mortgage pay down and rising rents?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deacf/deacf0456f9c8ec0f0fa01ec9746488b1680e92e" alt=""
19 January 2025 | 8 replies
A longer timeline will make paying the extra 2% now more attractive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e0e4/8e0e450dfe0054c2d848f1d4e132fb69a5812ac1" alt=""
22 January 2025 | 4 replies
Of course you don't want to over pay for land, but site conditions and construction type will dictate costs....is there underpinning?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21975/21975ba5d35961abdbf21f29a7fb794e06faf9bb" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 1 reply
I could take look at it for you, and help you understand it if it's a standard lease, no need to pay me, although I am not a lawyer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c785/6c785a9d5b182c1db256b10a24624760c7df7e79" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 11 replies
The law does NOT apply to landlords:With less then 5 rental unitsThat live in one unit of a duplex and rent out the other unitThat rent out rooms in the home they occupySo, landlords can no longer state in their rental ads, "Section 8 not accepted".The reverse is also true, "Section 8 only", cannot be used.We've always recommended screening S8 tenants the same way as cash-paying tenants.Landlords waiving application fees and/or security deposits only for S8 prospects may also be violating Fair Housing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c37ea/c37ea110f1e6b6a5539cbf46f819d261ee334840" alt=""
19 January 2025 | 1 reply
We will be paying nearly $50,000/year in property insurance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35750/357507f28a4c98106c870863146a582bd7eadbf3" alt=""
4 February 2025 | 31 replies
G'Day Alejandro,As a few have already mentioned, take a peak at Toledo also.In my opinion lower potential for long term appreciation but solid/"boring" cashflow.I prefer my portfolio to be "boring" but cashflowing lolLow entry points (Sub $100,000), high rents (Above the 1% rule).Blue collar working class decent folks that will stay and pay.Depending on the area but no derelict homes, yards well kept, cars with wheels and all tenants are employed.Plus, all are sophisticated enough to pay rent online so property management doesn't have to collect rents with bullet proof vests and shot guns lolI'm bias toward Toledo but it's worth considering.Wishing you much success