data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5624a/5624a09751b31b6135d9f12921e6a2693b14812f" alt=""
28 October 2013 | 56 replies
Also looking to acquire as many longer term cash flow instruments as possible via sfr, mfr, notes, and renewable energy investments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddba7/ddba794ec2d05bc73a9951acc40180cb5daccba0" alt=""
26 May 2014 | 57 replies
I'm a system guy, I like things to work efficiently and smoothly just like and instrument.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/149a2/149a288eb576bf747fdf4c76259d4385a83b9d0a" alt=""
22 April 2013 | 17 replies
What ever the face value of the DOT is written for the market value will be far less as there are costs to enforce the instrument and it is a defective instrument in the sense that it was not fully recorded properly at the time of the court order.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92c09/92c09a43bce15b640666d70f9f9433edd69e8382" alt=""
13 April 2013 | 30 replies
Accordingly, the “family resemblance” test permits an issuer to rebut the presumption that a note is a security if it can show that the note in question bears a strong family resemblance to an item on the judicially crafted list of exceptions, or convinces the court to add a new instrument to the list.We must all remember to be careful when reading codified law and making interpretations of it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e358d/e358d07f0f78d7c93d131e849214f0892856091a" alt=""
5 May 2021 | 57 replies
He assured me that SC has a state specific exemption allowing for seller held financing without the mandatory use of an RMLO for up to 5 properties per calendar year.Taken directly from the SC code of laws: "Exempt person" means:"a natural person who sells residential real estate and who lends or services, in one calendar year, no more than five purchase money notes secured by mortgages, deeds of trust, or other security instruments on the real estate sold as security for the purchase money obligation."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/446a6/446a6772a1f2463f9e75fbd11ecd01dd37aab0c7" alt=""
4 May 2013 | 16 replies
The Due on Sale, which all lenders have in the deed of trust, either under "Due on Sale" or "Transfer of Property or a Beneficial Interest in the Property" .....that those beneficial interests transferred in a bond for deed, contract for deed, installment land contract, lease purchase or lease with the option to purchase or escrow agreement, the intent of which is the transfer of title by Borrower at a future date to a purchaser...Lender may require immediate payment in full of all sums secured by this Security Instrument....So, there are 2 main wrong phraseologies with Due on Sale that people often ask:"Won't that trigger the Due on Sale?""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfc73/dfc731a82f87c39db15488f4c0111d02cbb0b315" alt=""
10 June 2013 | 24 replies
To deal with these instruments a securities license is required.A hedge fund and distressed asset fund or any fund is really just and investor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33128/331286144433491b4579f556087cb649b909fb56" alt=""
25 January 2014 | 48 replies
The podcasts, blogs, forums, and books were instrumental to this rehab.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fff85/fff8511dd447ce4d840f0b0329e547ab0ad493c5" alt=""
9 May 2013 | 9 replies
this is an excerpt from ours:4.Affiant states under oath that she does not reside in above described property, this property is not the Homestead property of the borrower, and that this loan is for the business operations of the borrower. 5.Affiant further states that she is familiar with the nature of an oath; and with the penalties as provided by the laws of the State aforesaid for falsely swearing to statements made in an instrument of this nature.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97bc7/97bc75300552e39eb076497171902b604bae3393" alt=""
8 May 2013 | 2 replies
I looked at the docs on the Registry of Deeds and I can see that the last doc is a "Instrument of Taking" form for $7000+ of taxes from 2009.