16 June 2018 | 14 replies
So, yes, technically your wife can count towards the occupation requirement, but it's geared more for military members PCS'ing or setting up a household in a new location before the veteran can occupy the home, or a member on tour in one of those unaccompanied "hardship" locations where families aren't welcome, or on deployment, not for a couple who live in the same major metropolitan area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f086/7f08675d64d5b39b433920d5160b9985a8eb42a3" alt=""
10 September 2017 | 17 replies
So I guess not technically a closing just a nice wire into our bank account.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30ea4/30ea466b3a6481a33de4b9a6f58d1e7d7919c89e" alt=""
13 September 2017 | 9 replies
I won't get to technical about it but you have nothing to be concerned about.The panel in your unit is called a sub panel, this is also normal and your limited access to the main panel is not a problem.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c680a/c680a600094e65c830be9616d5a18128fb657aa2" alt=""
10 September 2017 | 2 replies
Maybe it is seen as "taking too much" or there is a technical aspect that makes it hard.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e2a/43e2ab535edf2193132ab1cb9da747541e0e9723" alt=""
17 September 2017 | 20 replies
I could technically afford something here but I would be locked in to the middle class rut of being chained to a job in order to pay the bills and I do not want that life.
10 September 2017 | 4 replies
Using mailboxes for anything but mail is technically illegal, but I doubt anybody would do anything about it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/451b0/451b0ab4d7a7a7d0e06220bb149fd609afaa9b8e" alt=""
11 September 2017 | 18 replies
Man I love this website, thanks for all of the awesome info,So it sounds like while it is not technically law, it is advisable to put it in the owners name.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75b07/75b07ebe9a71d65e2bedb907d5241139e2765107" alt=""
12 September 2017 | 3 replies
Being under the recommended limit technically and after reading the guideline I feel like we don't have to put one in right away and I will probably retest next year to see where we are at.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e865b/e865b907458bbfe65465086a5f725ad129cbccb6" alt=""
10 December 2017 | 18 replies
If she stays, then I technically have a 0 vacancy rate with Cash Flow of $170 starting in December (and CoC of 7.4%).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9e2e/b9e2e8afbf4684ca915cc1bc6e6c815bcf7c357f" alt=""
15 September 2017 | 5 replies
BP having some technical issues!