data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c77f3/c77f331ceeabf4dd3faf53da1c1574b749af9248" alt=""
28 December 2006 | 7 replies
i mean it doesn't have to be that blatant.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65ca7/65ca7edd1c2c223309238c1ceabcdc73555d28bb" alt=""
13 April 2007 | 23 replies
And there is one blatant connection that I would love to make.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa4f4/fa4f43fd4e751e8dd524824532119f598ccce6fb" alt=""
24 December 2013 | 7 replies
I have bought properties that needed roof and sometimes we would need to get on the roof to tell if there was one or two layers of shingles, but we always new how many layers before we started the job.You also said "they looked in the attic and didn't see any need for redecking" It would be blatantly clear from looking in the attic that there was more than one layer of shingles (look at the number of roofing nails sticking through the decking).As for uncovering bad roof decking during the tear off process, sometimes you just don't know until you tear off the shingles, other times its obvious from looking in the attic or walking on the roof.Sounds like this company has taken you for a ride.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14c1d/14c1d6a8e32042da402b03650bbe321173d2c6fb" alt=""
26 December 2013 | 15 replies
Have you actually been inside a sellers house where they have blatantly told you something similar to what your describing?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a66/b6a66767adaf5504807ede4235d758c249d98132" alt=""
19 December 2014 | 40 replies
HUD is very clear on who can bid and the only way to bid as an owner occupant is to blatantly lie on the HUD bid form.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff95d/ff95d814cc37eab2960224a73ea8893174db706f" alt=""
24 May 2015 | 33 replies
They are usually levied as punishment for blatantly ignoring or delaying the investigation process and acting in obvious "bad faith" rather than for the actual violations of ERISA code.4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/619cf/619cf80799ba376c9d50c2884e81e5bf2bbc6468" alt=""
3 October 2012 | 42 replies
Shame on any BP members who read this and did not post something pointing out the rather blatant mis-understanding of the guidelines given by the "50% rule".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5624a/5624a09751b31b6135d9f12921e6a2693b14812f" alt=""
6 October 2012 | 4 replies
Did you just miss out on the President sending an ambassador and others out to push a story that they knew was a blatant lie, ie. the American ambassador, 2 retired navy seals and a computer tech guy were killed because of a video?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5624a/5624a09751b31b6135d9f12921e6a2693b14812f" alt=""
13 October 2012 | 16 replies
Aside from that, the blatant lies the administration is spreading about the murder of Americans in Libya, is beyond being acceptable.