I expect the seller can request the minutes and then supply them to the buyer as part of the disclosure process.You are correct on the inspection.

the challenge seems to be in finding an escrow/title company that will allow the "double escrow" to be done.....for example: there is an escrow open that is required by the lender once the "approval" from the lender is secured....then there needs to be another escrow opened between the "buyer" and the "end-buyer" on the same property....so, "end buyer" comes into escrow with the $300K plus closing costs, closes existing escrow on the property...then the title/escrow officer walks into the next room and applies the $250K plus closing costs to the original escrow to close that one.in theory and once in the past this was the way it was and still should be...but, now as it seems, most escrow/title companies are not wanting to do the "double" escrow for reasons of "full disclosure" to all parties, for fear of not being "sued" for some type of fraud.those of us not engaging in these tactics get penalized.....but, such is life....i have a title company that has stated they will do a "double" escrow but, will need to let the lender know this fact. not disclose the "amount" the "end-buyer" is paying, merely disclose there is a 'double" escrow in effect....well, obviously this should kill the deal right at the very end....so, not a wise direction to take....

With it, the usual realtor disclosure forms.

It is a way to force disclosure of all fund transfers that are directly tied to the transaction.John Corey

Just curious, I know there is a contract and I've seen it recommended that when acting as a birddog to have both parties sign a contract, non-disclosure, and/or non-compete.

It would likely be mortgage fraud if you are not disclosing the full details to the lender.John is correct about the disclosure.

Three thoughts on this, and I'd like your input:First, while I do agree with full disclosure, I wonder if this is asking for trouble by willingly firing up a red flag.Second, I wonder if the lender would mind a new payer, especially in today's market.

Its hard for me to have sympathy, just because your poor doesn't mean you can trash the place especially when we were working with them.....big mistake.Our broker wasn't too sure about disclosure to future renters.

The bank often doesn't know much history, so seller disclosures can be limited or non-existent.

We have new laws here in CO that mean you have to have some extra documents and disclosures.