On this site I don't see anything about that:http://www.realtor.org/rmoprint.nsf/pages/assistants03dThe California Department of Real Estate (DRE) has promulgated "Guidelines" on what unlicensed assistants may and may not do.

NOO properties in every jurisdiction I have ever heard of are required to use a licensed contractor because by definition it is not your personal dwelling so you are not allowed as an unlicensed individual to pull the permit and do the work.

there might be plenty of other hazards on the job site that me as a building owner is responsible for …hanging wiring, maybe a beam that is just waiting to fall on somebodyAlso ..we all know we should hire licensed guys …but there are a lot of unlicensed trades who are skilled in what they do and price competitive …if I hire an unlicensed person as a contractor and he does damage to the building or his work caused somebody to get hurt…would my general liability insurance be the one to take from there ?

Dylan - you are not a principal.You are an unlicensed intermediary.

With so many new and unlicensed people running around we should be ready to adapt to new legislation.

If it isn't clear, I am unlicensed.

Unlicensed contractors generally have no idea what overhead is, let alone what their company's overhead expense is.

You are marketing your contract to sell, not a property which it is possible to argue would be unlicensed brokerage.

In many states, a realtor or licensed real estate broker can not compensate unlicensed people or companies.

I said you introduced me to that unlicensed contractor.