data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb4bd/bb4bdae9a3d0855af5e5ca4f9711e390307064f5" alt=""
20 September 2020 | 72 replies
@Todd PultzLikely doesn’t help much but I interpreted what Joe was saying as selling to do 20% down on 5 more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2102/b210267bf7b54c2d957f3f5de7626b1a61be65d1" alt=""
9 July 2022 | 5 replies
Interpreting them correctly is quite another thing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5c54/b5c54b7c508aebae90db57c1447d59550722d745" alt=""
20 August 2021 | 8 replies
You are basically saying I will go month to month if there is a problem with you but they could interpret that you are a going to violate for any number of smaller lease issues.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64890/648909e0b5719f9f1417b7ca7dfb345274cd82b5" alt=""
18 January 2022 | 16 replies
It's dense and not always easy to interpret but it's all there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/645bb/645bb4d5e8ef4fe5da49ee812e8b318e5f27261d" alt=""
28 March 2016 | 7 replies
Stocks are measured using a Price / Earnings ratio (ref: http://www.investopedia.com/university/peratio/peratio1.asp) Although a simple indicator to calculate, the P/E is actually quite difficult to interpret.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe41b/fe41bd236fe9adcb3b79c3488a1959d4d1486473" alt=""
3 March 2014 | 21 replies
Some of it appears inconsistent and could be open to conflicting interpretations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb46f/eb46f02ef69084be6877d01d41ae978b5a5a6c5f" alt=""
21 March 2013 | 8 replies
Of course, the state's revenue department might have their own interpretation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1646/b1646a9566724e205a3cfc561bbea4ff24352532" alt=""
17 June 2013 | 17 replies
Just like a banker does not come by your home, even though the Deed of Trust probably allows by some interpretations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38689/38689969ec5a9703cb19dd974f074959eb2e1da9" alt=""
7 January 2014 | 13 replies
Not saying you are interpreting the data wrong or have the wrong data, but if these types of same patterns seem to occur often to you, then I would be more inclined to think you may have bad data or understand it incorrectly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8269/f8269ce8a43f847562d5eec49a1ac0cfbc33fdca" alt=""
11 June 2013 | 15 replies
Thank you.Did I correctly interpret your response in that (i) you think at least a primary LLC is the right way to go, and (ii) only if you have a ton of equity in an individual property does it make sense to separate into separate LLC... having (in the hypothetical example above) $50K equity in an individual property (~12% of Bobby's net worth) does not warrant the headache of having a separate LLC.