I really appreciate all the professionals jumping in and making a bit for their particular region, as it causes me to think a bit more about the vast opportunities that are before us.

When you want to buy another property, your income must be sufficient to cover both mortgage payments (the new property mortgage + the higher balance on your cashout refi mortgage).

We help investors to fund their deals, and making sure they have sufficient runway to qualify for multiple deals.

In the past there were more options to get creative with seller financing etc to put down less than that, but now the primary lender in general won't allow this as they want to assure you have sufficient skin in the game.

This poses a challenge because one of the requirements for a 1031 exchange is that both the relinquished property (the property being sold) and the replacement property (the property being purchased) must be held for investment or used in a trade or business.If your client's mother purchased the land less than a year ago, it's unlikely that it would qualify as replacement property for a 1031 exchange because it hasn't been held for investment or used in a trade or business for a sufficient amount of time.However, there may be other options available to minimize the tax implications for your client and his mother:Hold the Property Longer: If your client's mother holds onto the land for a longer period of time and can demonstrate that it is held for investment purposes, it may become eligible for a 1031 exchange in the future.Consider Other Investment Properties: Your client could explore other investment properties that have been held for a longer period of time and would qualify as replacement property for a 1031 exchange.

If she wanted cash in addition to refinancing the current loan balance you could also look at getting a HELOC on the property if you have sufficient equity to pay her back her portion of the equity owed.

According to her, the info on the site you noted above is no longer accurate.Good afternoon,Housing Choice Voucher program participants are responsible for tenant related damages; normally the funds to correct tenant related damages will come out of the deposit, if the deposit is not sufficient the family is to be charged.The HA that administers the Housing Choice Voucher is not responsible for tenant related damages.The document you attached is not updated information for the Housing Choice Voucher Program.Best RegardsPamela B.

They have physical limitations that they can't work around to be 100% self-sufficient in every situation.

If you do move it to an LLC it would be for asset protection purposes, however to other's comments - the 1 LLC won't be sufficient. 

In str there is no right or wrong as the spectrum of items in this area is vast- location, type, size, etc etc etc.