15 October 2018 | 0 replies
Tenant-buyer must exercise their option by day 180.2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b361/4b36127c335595e6898b0732bcd07ec211f1c020" alt=""
31 October 2018 | 13 replies
@Jerel Ehlert thanks for the insight that pretty much nails this down then and I have a full understanding thanks for the heads up it is actually a relief in knowing that I can just go on a month to month even though they marked those out and still exercise terminating the lease with the tenant upon notice.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20d9c/20d9c3175675b79e6d9dc7756f5c62512ea5c806" alt=""
19 October 2018 | 18 replies
Relax, you're fine.As with a trust, lenders do not exercise the "due on transfer/sale" clause when real property is transferred to the same individuals in an official capacity (e.g.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a664c/a664c17ad4d94e6066b9c34c87201666bb2ce938" alt=""
18 October 2018 | 66 replies
For example, if you split the difference as has been suggested, have the lease where they pay $2800 the first year and $2600 if they exercise the option.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c68c/4c68c57c76d5db65c74989afd4462df350d7ad91" alt=""
18 October 2018 | 8 replies
The person moves their family into the home and hopes to exercise the option in 1 year. 2 months into it, the lender finds out and calls the loan due.
18 October 2018 | 7 replies
It seems that a lease purchase with stipulations to make the buyer responsible for repairs would be more advantageous than renting because the property owner wouldn’t be responsible for any repairs, they get a bigger up front payment from the sale of the option (which will help with vacancies) and if the buyer exercises the option at the end that’s a win too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52ea0/52ea09b9e928f298a3da61d5d4276e027b9a7832" alt=""
17 October 2018 | 1 reply
I’d like to transfer them to an LLC however from what I understand if a property still carries a loan and title is transferred to an LLC the lender may exercise their right to require the loan be paid in full.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e1b9/5e1b9adc514eb7c88ed2a60946a94a2ef165a283" alt=""
20 October 2018 | 7 replies
Stagger the end dates so you never find yourself with all three units going vacant at once.Another benefit of having them sign a new lease.... you can raise the rents if they are below market and immediately give yourself an enhanced return on investment.Good luck
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6289e/6289e5bd576d119d0bc9ee4eee5aff995ffc583e" alt=""
26 October 2018 | 43 replies
As Jay explained, it's honestly not the end of the world if the IRS exercises the redemption right.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f9fc/4f9fcc311a602cb7a5b307ec255e583caabce40c" alt=""
23 October 2018 | 2 replies
It spelled out the terms of the purchase and a deadline for me to exercise it.