When you go to make the loan, you should inform the lender that the mailing addresses for the two units are A and B, so that they become aware that there are distinct mailing addresses.

Is there some sort of distinction that I am missing that separates us as investors from a dealer?

And yep, I have two distinct commercial mailing lists both of which are handpicked, one of which is very unique and brought the buyer for my very first commercial deal.

This distinction can allow a manager to have full control as opposed to it's owners.

No where in the SAFE Act is thgere any distinction of real or personal property, if the dwelling or any lot which is intended to be used for residential purposes is secured by the financing provided, it comes under the influences of the SAFE Act.

Again, absolutely nothing wrong with that, but the distinction is very important in the professional world...

We have thought about this and we figured it wouldn't be a problem since there are two separate and distinct legal entities.

Perhaps I can add some perspective to the debate since this topic has influenced my education distinctly throughout my life.

Nevada doesn't make any distinctions about the number of transactions to be considered a dealer, and their title transfer forms specifically require the dealer's license number.

Apparently they make no distinction between fame and infamy.