Generally, tenants don’t have the right to demand relocation for purely cosmetic improvements, nationally. 

They took a $1.5 MM property and found in this property:- $250k worth of 15-yr property which is paved parking, fencing, landscaping etc.- $150k worth of 5/7-yr property which is appliances, cabinetry, carpets etc.This is pretty typical for a commercial property cost segregation, and I see nothing wrong with it.The problem is in the line above that, called "Selling price."

I have a chance to acquire a property that includes a mobile home park (100% leased) and a separate multifamily property.

Obviously an unproportionate response to the potential risk of a shoot-out in the parking lot.Most people who ask the asset protection question have no assets to protect that are large enough to make them a viable target.

The way it was explained to me is that I am responsible for maintaining the roof, exterior walls, concrete floor, parking lot, landscaping, etc.

4) National or local tenants?

Freedom to fail. '08' could have been one of the greatest cleansings of our nation in generations but instead we got scammed and then force feed the kool-aid of how good it was that wall-street won out over main-street. 

Which is why there are more Chinese people parking their capital here than the other way around, and same goes for Russians with Western Europe. 

You also then are parking next to your ADU tenant all the time and in front of their "home."

Developer I hired was located overseas and every time I asked for reports on work done made an excuse about going off due to national holidays.