I am interested in residential homes, I plan to start with single family but have my eye on duplex, triplex, apartments, and debating section 8.

We're not desperate to get it rented, but I have three good tenants (who made it through prescreening) coming to look within the next three days, so I'm debating on whether I should just take the first one who qualifies and cancel the others, since the apartment has been vacant for so long.  

@Bob RoachGood question, the rule of thumb is normally 2%, but, it's debatable and hard to achieve in certain markets.Below, is a link to #AskBP podcast 083 that gives additional details.https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2015/08/1...

We have been debating whether it is worth the time/money for him to get a license.  

Many but not all have been probates.I'll stay away from the debate about investing in other states vs local because I found what I want in my own backyard.

It is more of a case by case basis and there is much debate on this very subject all over this forum and the web.

Therein lies the debate I suppose are 1% rule properties in CA "almost non-existent" or "fairly easy to find in a number of markets"?  

We are debating doing it in an 80 yr old SFH that we are taking down to the studs and giving it a very modern aesthetic. 

It's just not an option for some of us and there is no debating it. 

This is an "ad platform" model, and the one many project-driven issuers are using as it is exempt from all regulation (the offerings themselves still have to comply with SEC rules and state securities dealer laws, but the portal itself is free from oversight so long as it conducts business legally).There is a lot of internal industry debate about which is the best and there is disagreement among securities attorneys knowledgeable in the space about what is required.