Apparently the GP/fund struck an agreement with a local town earlier this year to build a campground in a popular trailed area owned by the town.

The year the mobile was built affects the choices.

I'd love to get one in Southern California, but I have learned that that might not be a good choice with the high cost of properties in Cali. 

In the Midwest, Cleveland and Detroit have been popular with investors due to lower entry prices and strong potential for appreciation.

Long story short, sold my home on 40 acres and business, made a nice profit, met an amazing man who is a contractor, got married, sold his property too and we moved to the high desert of Central Oregon near a very popular year round resort town.

Traditionally if you want to hedge against inflation, RE is a great choice.

Hi Erin, I work for a property management company in Milwaukee, Wi, and here are some thoughts to consider: Vacation rentals- Pros: Higher Income Potential due to tourists, Flexibility, Shorter Tenant CommitmentCons: Inconsistent Income depending on demand and time of year, More Management Required, Wear and Tear because of constant turnoverLong-term rentals- Pros: Stable Income, Lower Management Effort, Predictable Expenses, Less Wear and TearCons: Long-term commitment (this can be pro or con depending on the tenant), Market Dependence The choice between vacation rentals and long-term rentals largely depends on your financial goals, management capacity, and the property’s location.

Within those cities, I am targeting assets in central business districts (CBDs) and popular entertainment areas where large amounts of people congregate daily. 

It is a personal choice. 

Out-of-state investing is a top choice.