That's where experience comes in from seeing how  a judge interprets that vagueness in your local court with the tenant laws.So either go to eviction court yourself and learn the ropes or get an experienced eviction attorney who knows how these things play out in your area.

Many people will interpret whats going on in the market and sensationalize it, including the media.

I would definitely have an attorney read the original lease and see what their interpretation is of which outside space belongs to which unit.I would continue to serve him the three day notices and if he does not comply then you have a chance to go to court and try to evict him.

In the commercial RE contract if just says convey title which could be interpreted in different meanings depending on what side of the sale you are on. 

Ultimately, when complaints are filed, either a court, local real estate commissions, NAR, HUD, etc have to interpret if it was a violation and take it from there.

It's like you're trying to push it through before seller realizes how much money was left on table (not saying you are but sellers may interpret it that way). 

At that point whether an underwriter counts them as financed properties is like 70-80% chance of success that they don't based on the current guidelines because its subject to interpretation. 

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and the following below are my interpretation of the law and regulations with partial excerpts.

Regarding proving causation to the window…I would aim to figure out what happened on a  phone call and then recap the conversation over email so there is no room for miss interpretation.

Should see some further rate relief in the coming days as the markets interpreted Fed Chairman's speech today as dovish and indicating lesser rate hikes / sooner pause.