Ocean lakes in Myrtle is probably your best bet. 350k may get you a 3/2 which will gross around 45k per year. 2-3 years ago you could pick up a 4/4 or 5/3 for that price so you may be priced out but there are a ton of condos for that price of 350k although I wouldn't buy a condo there we have two 4/4's but we stole them before pricing went crazy here in ocean lakes.if your diligent you can still find a deal but is much harder now 

If a direct lake front property is getting $140 a night, then I think $120 is pretty fair IMHO.

A lake, A river, unique hiking experiences, ect. 

Also, due to KC mayor creating this ordinance, which to highlight and summarize includes:bans discrimination against tenants based solely on:"-Source of income from an occupation, including gig work or paying rent in cash-Use of public programs like Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, disability checks, or social security-Poor credit score-Prior evictions and alleged damages older than 12 months (less than 12 months can be a basis for denial)-Prior convictions or arrests (sexual and violent crimes are excepted, a landlord can still deny based on these convictions)-The ordinance also requires the city to proactively scan for rental ads using discriminatory language like “no Section 8” or “no past evictions”.

Yes, Jaime Blair with Allen Tate Mooresville Lake Norman

Rainier NP)Port Angeles, WA (Olympic NP)Pacific Beach/Moclips, WA (Coastal, near Seabrook which is super cute but very expensive)Rockaway Beach, OR (Coastal, centrally located for Oregon Coast activities)Long Beach, WA (Coastal)Lake Cushman/Hoodsport, WA (Olympic Penninsula)

I listed my location as Lake Ozark, Missouri because my city doesn't show as a selection but I'm actually based out of Jefferson City, Missouri and scour all of Central Missouri for deals.

I’m looking for some help on the new apartment assessment form in Lake county area of Indiana.

I checked out their website.. they are showing C class and probably some D class rentalsCaution    they want you to get the loan and they are allegedly going to put some cash into these deals up front.. and you as investor get 60% ownership .. you are suppose to refi out in 5 years and pay them their cash plus 40% of the equity.. 

Seems like his case is weakened by the fact that he's (allegedly) gets hurt and then waits for months to sue?