Also, look at the P&L from the last 12-24 months from the seller, compare bank records, rent rolls and receipts, etc. and see in in the worst month it was still a good investment.

With this sort of agenda, there is no long-term victory, because it's a completely impossible platform.Further, a rent-striking tenant is highly unlikely to be well-capitalized - otherwise they would not risk their housing and credit for the long-term in order to capitalize on a temporary eviction freeze.

My suggestion: Although I agree the market will stabilize, go for the worst scenario possible and if your numbers still look good, go ahead.

We will see if they roll out any sort of special repayment or modification programs.

That’s when the government backs off and let’s tenants and landlords come up with some sort of agreement on how to pay back rent.

If they don't change the fridge's water filter, the worst that will usually happen is they'll probably end up with funny tasting/smelling water.I have another lease that's a custom lease written up by an attorney, and has a clause that specifically addresses HVAC filters:AIR FILTER REPLACEMENT AND/OR MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY [Landlord check this box if applicable]  The premises is supplied with a replaceable air filter as part of the HVAC system.

However, the worst thing you can do it force it and buy a property that doesn't make sense. 

Neighborhood is a solid B and this property was the worst house (probably a C minus/D condition).

My thought would be asking seller to increase kickback at closing from $38,000 to somewhere in the realm of $60,000-80,000.Worst case to close I can refinance other paid of assets from the business, but it's not a preferable option, plus I don't want to pay 2 years ago market price, when that's likely no longer the value when we close on it 5 months from now.

@Jacob SampsonOr want sort of an incentive too continue on the deal