As a property owner you must comply with all aspects of the law if you are financing any part of the option portion of the agreement.

It's my opinion that we educated and savvy sellers can save themselves a portion of the listing fees (~3%) by going DIY without selling for less, taking more time or loosing out in negotiations.

I did inherit some tenants who were on some sort of "bridge" program, which paid a portion of their rent for one year.

I am wholesaling a deal in Boulder Cty Colorado and the Buyer wants to give me a portion of the assignment up front, but give me the rest after he rehabs and closes on the final sale to owner occupant.

The RA team has recently added a CRM portion to their system that assists in organizing your leads and all communication related to your leads.

I’ve seen articles and heard podcast that suggest this would give me an equitable interest in the property and enable me to legally market it (without a real estate license) and then do a double close2) Secure a special power of attorney from the owner granting me the authority act on their behalf to market the property for a defined period of time and receive a portion of the profit from any sale at closing.Any thoughts on either of these approaches or any other approaches that would might be legal / illegal, particularly in Texas?

When you fund a loan, say for $100, so the borrower borrowed $100, each period that goes by, the balance would decrease based on the principal portion of the payment (assuming payments are made).

@Martin S DC: If you live in work in one of the four quadrants the Metro is clean, safe and used by a high portion of the population.

Just frustrating to sit back and let this happen as I am a person that drives my own business and I feel I am forced to turn this portion over to someone else.

But if someone had, for example, 50 single family rental homes, in Texas, were they able to sell a portion of the homes or all at once?