The condition of the leaking spout was noted in the initial inspection. He agreed to fix the problem and I'm kind of taking it as a loss because the agreement doesn't say "how" he was going to fix it. His idea of fixing it is removing it completely I guess.
We didn't catch it on the final walk-through as there was a lot of going back and forth on other major items of the house where I felt was my first priority. In hind sight, I should have just negotiated a little harder to get a larger check to cover re-fixing some items. I just let the waiting get next to me I guess (5 months and some change to close).
It's a learning experience for me.
The plumber is going to give me an estimate this week. (He's been really great to work with since I had him come in for other jobs -- very reasonable guy.) It may cost me a lot more to sit down with a lawyer than it would be to just fix it.
I know it seems like I'm crying over spilt milk, but this incident just seemed like the straw that broke the camel's back. There were several incidents where if I had not had inspections backed by ethically driven people, I would have had to come out of pocket for some major items. They didn't have to help me fix the issues, but it was an oversight and they did.
I thought multiple inspections were a bit of over kill and now I'm learning that going through an couple more times definitely wouldn't have hurt.
I think the order should be:
1.) Home Inspector
2.) Specialized inspector (Plumber, Electrician, Landscaper, etc.)
3.) Fix the problem
4.) Home inspector
5.) Specialized inspector again.
6.) Repeat step 3-5 as needed.
My error was skipping 5.
My contractor showed my how something can "look" fixed but no actually be fixed. Sooo... Lesson Learned and I'll put this one in my pocket for my next deal.