Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
BRRRR - Buy, Rehab, Rent, Refinance, Repeat
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago, 02/10/2024

User Stats

15
Posts
3
Votes
Sean MIddleton
3
Votes |
15
Posts

Help with understanding Cap Ex, Repair Costs, and Vacancy Rate

Sean MIddleton
Posted

I am in the analysis paralysis stage of learning before starting to invest in real estate. As I am running these numbers I feel like its a complete guessing game for the Cap Ex, Repair Cost, and Vacancy rate percentages. I have been running all of these at 10% each to ensure I don't get burned. However, this seems overly conservative and makes a huge difference in the over all ROI numbers. It seems really tough to find any deals that make sense running the number at 10% across the board for these. Does anyone have any set methods or systems in place for calculating these percentages? Any help would be much appreciated.

Loading replies...