Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

62
Posts
25
Votes
Ivor Grisel
  • Nijmegen, GE
25
Votes |
62
Posts

High cashflow, large downpayment vs. Low cashflow, no downpayment

Ivor Grisel
  • Nijmegen, GE
Posted

Hey everyone,

My girlfriend and me are looking for our first rental property, using the overvalue on our own home. There are two possibilities. Both not certain, but want some of your insights for the consideration on how far to pursue them.

First option is an appartment that is already rented out and has 4 tenants. Cashflow will be about 580. But most likely we will have to add 15k of our own money.

This is versus an appartment which would have two tenants (son of a neighbour and a friend of his). Cashflow would be 250. But we could do it without adding any money.

So lets say that we want to buy another property in about 2 years, the second option makes more sense, because we would have 15k plus two times the year income. The first option would still be negative. But in the long run, the first option would generate more cashflow...

There is also an emotional side to this: the first option has tenants which we did not screen. The second we already know one of the tenants which is a great guy. Also, the second property will allow us to go through the whole buying and renting part, so would learn us more.

The other part is rentor protection. If the tenants of the first property would check the law, they would find out they are overpaying. They could force is to lower the rent. If that would happen, we would be screwed. That being said, the current tenants are not from our country and might not care/know their rights.

So that's the dilemma. We'll chase both options, but curious to know if I'm overlooking something. Any input is welcome!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

14,501
Posts
11,191
Votes
Theresa Harris
#3 Managing Your Property Contributor
11,191
Votes |
14,501
Posts
Theresa Harris
#3 Managing Your Property Contributor
Replied

If you can get into real estate with no extra money (option 2), that is a good option.  Just make sure you have extra money in case you have unexpected repairs or vacancies for the apartment.  The lower down payment also means you have more money for other units.

  • Theresa Harris
  • Loading replies...