Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

51
Posts
33
Votes
Lindsey Vargas
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Cocoa, FL
33
Votes |
51
Posts

Charging for pets each year ??

Lindsey Vargas
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Cocoa, FL
Posted

I inherited dream tenants and it is time to renew their lease. On their original lease, it states they will be charged $200 pet fee for EACH pet at the renewal of the lease. (They have 2 dogs) Does this seem steep? I know it's an opportunity to make an extra $400 but I see this being a huge problem to our tenants. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,690
Posts
5,930
Votes
Scott Trench
  • President of BiggerPockets
  • Denver, CO
5,930
Votes |
2,690
Posts
Scott Trench
  • President of BiggerPockets
  • Denver, CO
Replied

Agree with @Michael Smith. You need to create a policy that works for you and stick to it. With regards to pets the overall philosophy from me is this:

Pets increase your risk of damage substantially. It's a fact. This risk and the real dollars in damage that pets produce over time must be offset by advantages if we are going to allow them in our property. 

The overwhelming advantage of allowing pets into the property is that it increases the pool of potentially suitable renters

That's it. I know of no landlords - perhaps I will meet the first one in response to this post - who truly make money/profit, on average, from pet rent and pet fees. Over time, the big damage caused by pets when tenants move out crushes years of pet rent, deposits, and fees, more or less. I suppose an exception are the guys who truly can charge hundreds per month per pet on average.

The good news is that qualified tenants show up in droves when a property allows pets, oftentimes tenants who are far superior applicants to those without pets. This allows me to rent out my property to a lower risk tenant, and one who I believe is likely to stay for longer. Therefore, I allow pets in most rentals. 

In an attempt to offset the risk/damage that I believe the pets will cause, on average, over time, I charge the following per animal:

Cats: $200 move-in fee, plus $25 per month

Dogs: $200 move-in fee, plus:

- $25 per month for a small dog (less than 25 lbs) 

- $50 per month for a medium dog (25-50 lbs) 

- $75 per month for a large dog (50+ lbs) 

Additionally, I must meet the animal, and preferably at their current residence, prior to move-in. It's pretty difficult to hide an animal that makes an atrocious mess, barks incessently, etc. I can tell within seconds for dogs, for example.

In your case, you are lucky - you have a low risk tenant and low risk animals. You may be able to make an exception this time, and use your judgment to reduce or eliminate this fee. That's a privilege this one time. Never again - you must keep and enforce your policy, based on your philosophy.



Loading replies...