I’m working on a ground-up construction deal in Texas and getting close to the finish line. I already have a primary loan secured for the land and build, but I’m exploring options to bridge a small funding gap between loan proceeds and total project cost.
Curious to hear from others:
Have you used a second-position lender or alternative structure to cover that gap?
Any creative or experience-based tips for structuring something clean and simple?
What worked (or didn’t) when you had to cover a shortfall to get a project moving?
Appreciate any insights or experiences—feel free to DM if this is a conversation better had offline.
Lender · Tampa, FL · Member since 2013 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
1y
We just closed on a deal where an experience investor was spec building several homes, but the contractor greatly under-bid the job to get the deal. We had to refinance the original construction loan based on the new scope of work. This is something we've done a lot of, but to advise you, I would need to know more. Why was there a funding gap? What was the original lot purchase price? Did you pay for that completely and, if so, how much? If not, what did the financing stack look like? How much was the original construction budget and what has that grown to (minus the lot price? How long ago did you purchase the lot? What is the realistic "As Completed Value" and how did you arrive at that figure? How close are you (both in $s and time) to completing the project? There's a lot we would need to understand to give you proper advice. Thanks so much.
I’m working on a ground-up construction deal in Texas and getting close to the finish line. I already have a primary loan secured for the land and build, but I’m exploring options to bridge a small funding gap between loan proceeds and total project cost.
Curious to hear from others:
Have you used a second-position lender or alternative structure to cover that gap?
Any creative or experience-based tips for structuring something clean and simple?
What worked (or didn’t) when you had to cover a shortfall to get a project moving?
Appreciate any insights or experiences—feel free to DM if this is a conversation better had offline.
Thanks in advance!
If you provide answers to dougs questions then people could probably help you
Financial Advisor · Albuquerque, NM · Member since 2014 · 82 posts · 30 votes
4mo
This is a good question because “gap funding” often gets discussed as though it is one product, when in reality it can be structured several different ways.
A few comments above mentioned second-position financing and equity contributions, and I think that distinction is important.
Before pursuing gap funding, I would first verify:
Whether the primary lender allows subordinate financing
Whether the additional funds will be documented as debt or equity
Whether there are restrictions on repayment timing
Whether the project budget includes adequate contingency reserves
One thing I see investors underestimate is how quickly construction budgets can shift. Material costs, delays, change orders, inspection timing, and draw schedules can all affect the actual capital needed.
For that reason, I usually suggest stress-testing:
Construction timeline extensions
Cost overruns
Delayed draw reimbursements
Lower-than-expected valuations
Slower lease-up or disposition timelines
I also agree with the comments suggesting that lender transparency matters. Some capital sources may appear attractive initially but have provisions that become expensive if timelines extend.
From a deal-packaging perspective, I would want:
Detailed sources and uses
Full construction budget
Draw schedule
Contingency allocation
Exit strategy
Project timeline
Market support for valuation assumptions
Gap funding tends to work best when it strengthens an already viable deal rather than trying to rescue a deal with insufficient margin.