Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 11 days ago, 11/30/2024

User Stats

1
Posts
0
Votes
Natalie Jarusewski
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Maine
0
Votes |
1
Posts

When purchasing a multi-unit, what are deal breakers?

Natalie Jarusewski
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Maine
Posted

I own a duplex and am selling it. It's in a unique situation where both units are vacant. Is this a good time to sell? Or do other investors see this as a red flag and would prefer to have current leases?

Should I sign leases? What type of leases are most desirable?

A little more about the situation: I bought a duplex last year as a first investment property / primary residence. I planned on living in one unit and renting the other, this worked great. I also invested in improvements: new roof, water heaters, other major appliances, and a kitchen renovation.

Now, my situation has completely shifted. I need to move across the country and it isn't feasible to manage the property. I also need to liquidate in order to afford to purchase a new primary.

User Stats

380
Posts
78
Votes
Jaycee Greene
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Consultant
  • St. Louis MSA
78
Votes |
380
Posts
Jaycee Greene
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Consultant
  • St. Louis MSA
Replied

Hi @Natalie Jarusewski. Welcome to the BP Forum! I would recommend finding a tenant for at least one of the units, more than likely the one you lived in. That way you theoretically offer a better option for someone looking to do exactly what you did (live in one unit, rent the other one out). 

  • Jaycee Greene
  • [email protected]
  • User Stats

    739
    Posts
    503
    Votes
    Bradley Buxton
    Pro Member
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Nevada
    503
    Votes |
    739
    Posts
    Bradley Buxton
    Pro Member
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Nevada
    Replied

    @Natalie Jarusewski

    There are pros and cons to both. Without tenants it's easier to show the property and the condition can look better than if tenants have their stuff everywhere. Also the new owner has the advantage of screening their own tenants and signing leases at or above market rents. If you can sign tenants in one side make sure they are the best you can get and are paying at or above market. Investors do not like tenants that pay below market and re locked into long term leases. 

    Vacasa logo
    Vacasa
    |
    Sponsored
    We do the work. You get the ROI. We do it all for your vacation rental. All—marketing, pricing, guest requests, housekeeping & more.