Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

3,143
Posts
1,064
Votes
Jeff S.
  • Specialist
  • Portland, OR
1,064
Votes |
3,143
Posts

Second water meter in a duplex

Jeff S.
  • Specialist
  • Portland, OR
Posted

Old Portland duplex with single water line. Have owned many years and always wanted to add a second line but the cost.

Would you EVER consider spending $17,800 to save $2493 per year in water cost?  We do know that water will keep going up. The payback is around 7 years.

Yes I know about submetering and all but trying to keep track of all that lots of work.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,462
Posts
6,357
Votes
Greg Scott
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SE Michigan
6,357
Votes |
4,462
Posts
Greg Scott
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SE Michigan
Replied

If you are renting out one or both sides, you can bill back for water usage, even without a second meter.  If you don't want to split it by some formula, such as number of people, you could always charge a flat rate.  

If you did the either of the above, there doesn't seem to be much savings at all.  How do you get to $2,493?   You would probably have a much bigger benefit from low-flow water fixtures.

  • Greg Scott
  • User Stats

    4,462
    Posts
    6,357
    Votes
    Greg Scott
    • Rental Property Investor
    • SE Michigan
    6,357
    Votes |
    4,462
    Posts
    Greg Scott
    • Rental Property Investor
    • SE Michigan
    Replied

    If you are renting out one or both sides, you can bill back for water usage, even without a second meter.  If you don't want to split it by some formula, such as number of people, you could always charge a flat rate.  

    If you did the either of the above, there doesn't seem to be much savings at all.  How do you get to $2,493?   You would probably have a much bigger benefit from low-flow water fixtures.

  • Greg Scott
  • User Stats

    3,143
    Posts
    1,064
    Votes
    Jeff S.
    • Specialist
    • Portland, OR
    1,064
    Votes |
    3,143
    Posts
    Jeff S.
    • Specialist
    • Portland, OR
    Replied

    @Greg Scott $2493 was my water bill for the entire year.

    BiggerPockets logo
    BiggerPockets
    |
    Sponsored
    Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

    User Stats

    225
    Posts
    130
    Votes
    Elias Halvorson
    • HI
    130
    Votes |
    225
    Posts
    Elias Halvorson
    • HI
    Replied

    I would do it for the tax write offs, as well as another positive for the resale value. 

    • Elias Halvorson
    • 808-517-6416
    business profile image
    Elias Halvorson C2 Hawaii NMLS#1697041HI Branch NMLS#1244222
    5.0 stars
    85 Reviews

    User Stats

    40
    Posts
    18
    Votes
    Eric Koelling
    • Residential Real Estate Broker
    • Portland, OR
    18
    Votes |
    40
    Posts
    Eric Koelling
    • Residential Real Estate Broker
    • Portland, OR
    Replied
    Quote from @Jeff S.:

    Old Portland duplex with single water line. Have owned many years and always wanted to add a second line but the cost.

    Would you EVER consider spending $17,800 to save $2493 per year in water cost?  We do know that water will keep going up. The payback is around 7 years.

    Yes I know about submetering and all but trying to keep track of all that lots of work.


     Out of curiosity, were you quoted $17,800 by a company? If yes, which company?

    User Stats

    2,370
    Posts
    2,246
    Votes
    Jonathan R McLaughlin
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Boston, Massachusetts (MA)
    2,246
    Votes |
    2,370
    Posts
    Jonathan R McLaughlin
    • Rental Property Investor
    • Boston, Massachusetts (MA)
    Replied

    A bit long on the payback but add in any value increase to the property from doing it, including its increased attractiveness to condo conversion down the line, immediately better cap rate, etc...and it could be worth it.  Also, water prices aren't going down. Price seems high but no data there.

    Certainly a better use than paying taxes if you have the cash. 

    And are they likely to ban such changes in the future?

    User Stats

    2,092
    Posts
    3,064
    Votes
    Stuart Udis
    #2 Buying & Selling Real Estate Contributor
    • Attorney
    • Philadelphia
    3,064
    Votes |
    2,092
    Posts
    Stuart Udis
    #2 Buying & Selling Real Estate Contributor
    • Attorney
    • Philadelphia
    Replied

    Is the entire water bill usage? Here in Philadelphia the water bills are split into two line items, usage and storm water collection. The storm water collection is based on the size of the parcel  with some relief given if there’s storm water management systems on site (usually only applicable for larger sites where developments were required to implement such systems). However if you’re in a municipality that charges for storm water, how does that get allocated between two metered water accounts? That’s the one question I have. 

    My advice would be to  charge each tenant a flat $100 water fee. Separately metered gas & electric are generally viewed as more valuable because water is less commonly metered. If you feel you can bill separately for water if metered you should have no issue simply adding a flat water fee and I’d imagine the $17,800  could go a long way in a 2 unit building for upgrades that would have a greater impact on revenue. Does the building have central air? Are the kitchens and bathrooms updated? Do the closets have nice organization storage? If the building does not have direct access into each unit is there a remote access system for tenants to allow guests in? These are areas where I find I can generate best return on my building Improvements & that’s where I’d recommend you focus any spending. 

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • User Stats

    5,474
    Posts
    7,874
    Votes
    Marcus Auerbach#2 Investor Mindset Contributor
    • Investor
    • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
    7,874
    Votes |
    5,474
    Posts
    Marcus Auerbach#2 Investor Mindset Contributor
    • Investor
    • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
    Replied

    Your ROI assumption is that when you divide the lines, the tenants will pay for it. That's a big IF. You could simply put in the lease that each will pay half and save the $17,800.

    User Stats

    3,143
    Posts
    1,064
    Votes
    Jeff S.
    • Specialist
    • Portland, OR
    1,064
    Votes |
    3,143
    Posts
    Jeff S.
    • Specialist
    • Portland, OR
    Replied

    @Eric Koelling from the city system development charge for a 5/8” meter $4791, install fee city 8475 and 4500 for the plumber to run from meter to house.

    User Stats

    3,143
    Posts
    1,064
    Votes
    Jeff S.
    • Specialist
    • Portland, OR
    1,064
    Votes |
    3,143
    Posts
    Jeff S.
    • Specialist
    • Portland, OR
    Replied

    @Stuart Udis multiple charges including water, sewer and storm water.

    I have charged separately in the past then they grumble when one uses lots of water gardening or whatever.

    Have a vacancy coming up which is rare and an opportunity to improve the place wherever needed.

    User Stats

    5,474
    Posts
    7,874
    Votes
    Marcus Auerbach#2 Investor Mindset Contributor
    • Investor
    • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
    7,874
    Votes |
    5,474
    Posts
    Marcus Auerbach#2 Investor Mindset Contributor
    • Investor
    • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
    Replied

    Turnover is always an opportunity to improve, but the goal should be better tenants and/or higher rents. 

    Typical cosmetic (lifestyle) upgrades we do are better/more LED lighting, dimmers, flooring, paint, trim, solid wood door slabs in place of the hollow core etc. And if you have a bigger budget: kitchens and bathrooms. 

    Anything that creates a better experience for a tenant. A secondary consideration is also resale value.

    User Stats

    107
    Posts
    82
    Votes
    Replied

    As a landlord, I just bill back the water bill based on the amount of occupants per side.  As a purchaser, I really like when a property already has utilities that are split but I wouldn't pay a 20K premium to do it.  Therefore my vote on this is no.

    User Stats

    1,720
    Posts
    1,208
    Votes
    Alan Asriants
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Philadelphia, PA
    1,208
    Votes |
    1,720
    Posts
    Alan Asriants
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Philadelphia, PA
    Replied
    Quote from @Stuart Udis:

    Is the entire water bill usage? Here in Philadelphia the water bills are split into two line items, usage and storm water collection. The storm water collection is based on the size of the parcel  with some relief given if there’s storm water management systems on site (usually only applicable for larger sites where developments were required to implement such systems). However if you’re in a municipality that charges for storm water, how does that get allocated between two metered water accounts? That’s the one question I have. 

    My advice would be to  charge each tenant a flat $100 water fee. Separately metered gas & electric are generally viewed as more valuable because water is less commonly metered. If you feel you can bill separately for water if metered you should have no issue simply adding a flat water fee and I’d imagine the $17,800  could go a long way in a 2 unit building for upgrades that would have a greater impact on revenue. Does the building have central air? Are the kitchens and bathrooms updated? Do the closets have nice organization storage? If the building does not have direct access into each unit is there a remote access system for tenants to allow guests in? These are areas where I find I can generate best return on my building Improvements & that’s where I’d recommend you focus any spending. 


     I am also from the Phila area and really there is only 1 water line in 99% of mulit family homes. 

    Hot water is usually separated it is just the cold water that is often not.

    For a very large building a flat fee is the move because the back billing and tracking of who paid for what would be hectic, but for a small MF like a duplex it is very easy.

    I split the bill by the fractional amount of people who live in the unit.

    In other words, the amount of people that live in the unit divided by the total amount of people living in the builidng.

    So if there are 3 people upstairs and 2 people downstairs.

    the upstairs pays 3/5 of the bill, and downstairs pays 2/5.

    No need to separate anything, you know the tenants will cover 100% of the bill and this approach is fair. 

    A flat fee can be good, and with $100/unit in our area you are highly likely to cover the bill and even have money left over, but you do run some risk of paying a difference. 

    business profile image
    Alan Asriants - New Century Real Estate
    5.0 stars
    90 Reviews
    Steadily logo
    Steadily
    |
    Sponsored
    Need property and liability insurance for your rentals? BP Investors trust Steadily for great rates and tailored coverage for short and long-term rentals.