Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

95
Posts
91
Votes
Roberto Gutierrez
  • Nashville, TN
91
Votes |
95
Posts

Should seller pay for Environmental Phase 2?

Roberto Gutierrez
  • Nashville, TN
Posted

Looking for some guidance here. In the process of acquiring an 8 unit apartment building. Going in with the units under market rent by $100, so there is a good opportunity for upside in this deal. There is a Pilot gas station about 120 ft (slight up gradient) from our property, and our environmental phase 1 shows there was a spill in 2011. A corrective action plan was put in place during 2013, and February of 2017 the soil contamination was said to be below the "site specific cleanup levels". In other words they have cleaned it up most of the way. Our engineers are recommending a phase 2, but the current owner doesn't want to pay for it. He is confident any contamination could be attributed to Pilot, and the tenants are also served with city water and sewer as opposed to well water.

This is a smaller deal, so i would rather not pay another $5200 on top of the $2000 already paid for the Phase 1. My thinking is that any competent investor would not carry on without getting an answer on this looming issue, even if there is a small chance of contamination.

Any input is appreciated. Would you all tell him to pay it or your out?

Loading replies...