Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 13 years ago, 03/30/2011

User Stats

41
Posts
3
Votes
Brandi Paul
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Orange County, CA
3
Votes |
41
Posts

Short Sale Flips-MLS info

Brandi Paul
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Orange County, CA
Posted

Hello,
I have a question regarding what information is best to disclose in the agent only remarks section of the MLS listing when listing a short sale flip. Do you note that it is an investor flip? It seems to cause confusion with agents who look up the property and see that is has a NOD or NTS but isn't listed as a short sale because an investor has already contracted to purchase it and is having it listed to find the C buyer.
Any advice and/or experiences shared would be much appreciated.

User Stats

1,018
Posts
801
Votes
Scott Hubbard
  • Rehabber
  • Tucson, AZ
801
Votes |
1,018
Posts
Scott Hubbard
  • Rehabber
  • Tucson, AZ
Replied

You should disclose the Seller is not owner of record but you need to also not disclose too much in the listing.

Some have had success with," Sale is contingent upon seller exercising its option to purchase and resell. Please contact me for more details".

In my opinion, you can refer to the investor as seller provided the owner of record has granted his or her rights to market the property and the investor as an option to purchase and resell.

Also, having the investor record a notice of option or a memorandum with the investor's name can help to clarify.

I am of the opinion when disclosing to prospective agents, you are much better off keeping it simple with a reference to call you for clarification.

User Stats

41
Posts
3
Votes
Brandi Paul
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Orange County, CA
3
Votes |
41
Posts
Brandi Paul
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

Thank You Scott. I appreciate the suggestions.

I agree that the information should be concise and to the point and if the agents would like further clarification, they can call.

BiggerPockets logo
BiggerPockets
|
Sponsored
Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

User Stats

470
Posts
315
Votes
Bill Patterson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Portage, MI
315
Votes |
470
Posts
Bill Patterson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Portage, MI
Replied

Brandi,
What do your local MLS rules say? We have seen these vary as well as the interpretations of the rules. Scott's contingency language sounds like it may be a good option. Some where or somehow, it should be disclosed that the sale is contingent on the "B" investor getting the property, either with "third party approval required" or language like Scott suggested.
Bill

User Stats

858
Posts
305
Votes
Maryann L.
  • Specialist
  • Massachusetts
305
Votes |
858
Posts
Maryann L.
  • Specialist
  • Massachusetts
Replied

Brandi, we have the agents put in the private remarks or disclosure section that the sale is contingent upon the seller taking title. AND YES, it confuses the hell out of most agents but my listing agent are patient and MOST of them are experienced in what we are doing so they can handle the questions.

User Stats

138
Posts
19
Votes
Andrew R
  • Real Estate Investor
  • California
19
Votes |
138
Posts
Andrew R
  • Real Estate Investor
  • California
Replied

I would recommend legal counsel from CAR possibly ?

User Stats

194
Posts
46
Votes
Corry Taie
  • Menifee, CA
46
Votes |
194
Posts
Corry Taie
  • Menifee, CA
Replied

I have it listed, then when I get an offer, I ALWAYS counter back & let the know 2 things.....

1) Contingent upon acceptable s.s. acceptance to seller & successful closing of sellers previous transaction.

2) Seller to become owner of record prior to closing of this transaction.

User Stats

185
Posts
33
Votes
Jerry R.
  • Wholesaler
  • Fort Myers, Cape Coral, Naples, FL
33
Votes |
185
Posts
Jerry R.
  • Wholesaler
  • Fort Myers, Cape Coral, Naples, FL
Replied

I know this is an old thread, but interesting so I em reviving it.

So Corry, it sounds like you are listing them on the MLS before you even have SS acceptance? I understand the successful closing part of the disclosure, but am not sure how one lists a property without having acceptance on it in the first place?

User Stats

41
Posts
3
Votes
Brandi Paul
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Orange County, CA
3
Votes |
41
Posts
Brandi Paul
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

Hi There,

Thank you again for all the replies and thanks to Jerry for reviving the thread. It is funny because I have seen various ways used in the MLS. Everything from Flip to REO to Standard Sale.

Unfortunately the deal in question never went through as the bank ended up foreclosing. They were apparently sick of postponing the Trustee's Sale as they had already postponed it quite a few times for the homeowner prior to our involvement. Definitely a learning experience.

I would love to hear how others are wording it for the MLS.

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Shane Haffey
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Santa Clarita , CA
1
Votes |
3
Posts
Shane Haffey
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Santa Clarita , CA
Replied

There's no magic pill here as most agents have been taught there's only one way to sell real estate so expect tons of questions however, I do believe it is unarguable act of disclosure. "Seller is investor purchasing property through a short sale in a SEPARATE transaction. Escrow w/your buyer is NOT a short sale;however seller must receive written consent from existing lien holders&acquire title free from liens in order to transfer clear title to your buyer."