Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

113
Posts
30
Votes
Shaun Hunt
  • Cedar City, UT
30
Votes |
113
Posts

$45,000 Fine

Shaun Hunt
  • Cedar City, UT
Posted

http://www.ksl.com/?sid=41644556&nid=148&title=sal...

NALS Apartment Homes denied the family permission to keep the boy's assistance animal after his doctor refused to assume liability for any possible damage caused by the animal. In addition, the owners will pay $25,000 to set up a settlement fund to compensate anyone else who might have been harmed.

How can I avoid this? I have a no pet policy, however I have been approached by those with a signed paper from an online doctor that says someone in the household needs a comfort animal. The animal has had no formal training other than what the owner has provided.

I get that people love their pets.

I am sure this topic has come up many times on this forum. I will continue to dig and read more. I would appreciate direction to threads on this topic.

Not knowing the whole story and not trusting that these few paragraph are accurate, the article tends to make me feel for the tenant. The owner discriminated because it allowed other pets without an RX and didn't allow certain pets due to the fact that the dog didn't have an RX and the owner had special needs.

Does it depend on the state you live in whether it is legal, or not, to exclude a comfort animal and/or a trained service dog?

Loading replies...